Politics: Coming To A Town Near You.

Labour Leader Ed Miliband on the Labour Doorstep

The following is a guest post by Tim Carter (@ForwardNotBack), a former Labour Party Press Officer.

The election teams rush to the constituency, generic posters and leaflets are handed out. Candidates are selected or announced. Carefully crafted biographies are passed to the media.

Our candidate is more local than yours (not mentioning that in some cases only by a distance of 20 miles) scream the early leaflets.

In the backroom of the hastily organised campaign office, heads shake and the local voter identification sheets are gazed upon with despair and teams are dispatched to boost the contact rate.

I the room next door a couple of workers sit reading back issues of local newspapers, hoping to find ‘the issue’ that will frame the local campaign… hours are spent searching the Internet for comments from the main rival(s) that will damage them and hopefully become a big issue. Coffee mugs, half eaten sandwiches and cold pizza slices litter the rooms.

Suits… have I mentioned the sharp, dark suits that adorn the activists who will soon be pounding unfamiliar streets, leafleting, knocking on doors and chatting to locals. Suits are everywhere, usually accompanied by red, blue or purple ties.

Local issues decided, hospital closure – every candidate is against it, even if their party is behind the plans. More funding for a local organisation or charity – who could oppose that?  Camera at the ready, candidate smiling (or looking stern) front page of introductory leaflet sorted. Winning here…On your side… The local choice… transferable slogans that make an appearance in towns up and down the country.

Then the attack… there has to be an attack. Inexperience, wrong priorities etc throw in a national issue and away we go.

When the candidate is around the rule is to smile, never let on that the latest batch of voter ID returns look worse than expected. Never lie just hide behind ‘it’s going well, early days, we will know more next week’

A buzz spreads through the office. A VISIT! Excitement grows and balloons are ordered. A quick programme is drawn up. Photo opportunity outside the threatened hospital with local campaigners is hastily arranged and local newspapers informed. Hours spent preparing briefing notes for the national visitor. The big day arrives. The phone rings… 5 MINUTES! The experienced hands continue with their work, the assembled local activists are pushed out of the front door, balloons and placards at the ready. A car enters the street cameras flashing. The car stops. The door opens and out steps…the under minister for paper clips. Heads drop but the campaign must go on. Above the murmurs of ‘who is that’ a cheer goes up… the campaign has begun in earnest!

A Mayor: Taking Birmingham into the 21st Century

Many people that I know that are instinctively against the idea of a Mayor for Birmingham – usually because it is a Tory idea, an American idea or a bad idea. I admire many of those people, and politically dislike a few of them.

They all have one thing in common: an aversion to change. Change can be a good thing, and change can be a bad thing. It can be a worrying thing and it can be difficult to handle. But change, for want of a better word, is a good thing.

Take the Birmingham Mayoral campaign. In May, at the same time as the local elections the people of Birmingham will have their chance to choose a leader for their city. A city that I have lived in for all of my life. A Mayor in Birmingham could really change the way that the City is run.

Will a Mayor be a good thing for Birmingham?

Yes, undoubtedly. Even if you ignore the experience of other large cities with directly elected mayors, it will be a positive for two simple reasons.

Firstly, it will provide real leadership.

If you ask people who their local councillor is they would probably struggle to tell you. I would doubt that more than 10% of people could tell you that Mike Whitby is Leader and Paul Tilsley Deputy Leader of the Council. A Mayor could remedy that by providing a single, unifying figure for the City.

In the 2011 local elections just below 1/2 of Brummies voted for elections to a council that has a budget of £3.5bn. A sorry state of affairs, and one that can be remedied by a Mayor –  a mayor who will be accountable to each and every voter. They will serve every resident in Birmingham. They will be able to direct council services across Birmingham to improve schools, rubbish collection, and all the other council services that we use. They will also be able to exercise real leadership in the council machine – As things stand Councillors outside of of the Executive have very little power to influence Council policy or hold the City Council’s leadership to account.

Secondly, a Mayor will bring investment into the City.

The last Labour Administration bought in a vast amount of national and international investment . Birmingham was a transformed city. It can be so again.  Attracting the investment, jobs and growth that Birmingham needs will be a task fit for the new Mayor.

London, the best example of where a directly elected mayor can work, is once again a global city. Ken Livingstone’s time as Mayor of London showed what could be done with active local leadership – the Olympics and Transport for London being the two most significant achievements.

We deserve the same treatment as London.

Birmingham is a great city, but it could be better. A Mayor would make us a globally ambitious city. In times of fiscal austerity a Mayor could better direct how taxpayers money is spent in the City and get value for money whilst ensuring that the people’s wishes are fulfilled.

A Mayor for Birmingham could transform the City. Do not let this opportunity disappear.

 

 

NB: As one of the 3,000 Labour members in Birmingham I will have an opportunity to vote for our candidate for Mayor. If there is a “yes” vote then I will be supporting Liam Byrne. 

 

 

 

Bradford West By-Election: A Lesson.

Photo/Guardian

Last night I wrote in glowing terms about how Ed Miliband had had his best week as Leader of the Opposition.

I wrote that with the expectation that Labour would win in Bradford. As we now know that did not happen. George Galloway beat Labour. Badly.

The final result was this:

Respect 18,341

Labour 8,201

A 15% swing from Labour to Respect. A shock in itself.

A couple of weeks ago I wrote about the return of “We Are Alright Labour”.  We clearly are not alright. Things must change.

A few observations from the result:

1) It is impossible (and would be very foolish) to base our entire national strategy on a single by-election result in Bradford. That must be made obvious to those on the extreme Left of the Labour Party who want to see Labour mirror Respect (Including George Galloway)

2) We were arrogant in our assumption that we would win in places like Bradford.

3) Tony Blair/The Iraq War/New Labour was not to blame for our defeat last night. Carl Gardner has pretty emphatically discredited that opinion.

4) The Labour Party has to change. The obsession of “the machine” with controlling internal party matters at the expense of the Party being electoral force must be stopped. The Party must engage more in community politics – the Movement for Change will be important in building links between local communities and CLPs.

5) As a Party we must redouble our efforts and resolve to do well in the May local elections and in the London mayoral race. If we do not win in London then the story will be Labour’s failure to be an effective electoral opposition – and the focus will be on Ed Miliband’s leadership.

 

 

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...