Ed Miliband’s Speech To Launch Labour’s Local Election Campaign

 

 

Photo/Guardian

My thoughts:

  • Ed gave a confident performance – the most confident that I have seen him in person.
  • Ed’s message was clear. Two issues (Crime and living standards) that will resonate with the public. Using the Health and Social Care Act as a political tool will motivate Labour activists and voters who have switched to Labour.
  • Difficult questions from members of the public were well handled. Ed was challenged from the Left and chose to distance himself from the position of some audience members on opposing all the cuts.
  • Ed seemed generally supportive of the idea of local mayors as a platform for Labour to demonstrate our competence in Government as a platform for the 2015 GE.
  • Ed was challenged about general disaffection with politics and the people who say that “you are all the same”. He responded by saying that he would not promise anything that he could not deliver and that politics was fundamental to society.

The text of Ed’s speech:

It is almost two years since David Cameron and Nick Clegg promised change.

The British people have given them a chance.

But two years on, it’s time to take stock.

They promised us growth that lasts.

And we haven’t even had any growth for eighteen months.

They promised fairer taxes.

But two years on, they are raising taxes for pensioners but cutting them for millionaires.

They promised us a stronger society.

But, accrding to the British Crime Survey, violence, theft and robbery are going up – the fastest rise in a decade.

Wrong values, wrong priorities, wrong choices.

This is a government out of touch.

But we are not going to rely just on the unpopularity of this government.

Because I know a lot of people thought Labour eventually lost touch when we were in government.

That is why Labour is changing so that we can once more change the country.

The issues on which Labour will campaign in these local elections are rooted in real life, in the experiences people in every local authority area in the country.

Living Standards

Jobs

The NHS.

Crime

On each of these issues we are with you.

These solutions are about making different choices, having different priorities and showimg we can deliver even when there is less money around.

Living standards

I’ve met so many people who say it’s so difficult to make ends meet.

Families all around this country are facing a quiet crisis of rising costs.

When they fill up a tank of petrol, take the train to work, or pay their gas or electricity bills.

And the government doesn’t understand what it’s like.

They are letting companies put up train fares by as much as 11%.

They are letting energy companies overcharge pensioners.

And they are making it worse in their decisions on tax.

Labour councils are working to keep your costs down.

In Manchester, despite having their budgets cut, the council are keeping every Sure Start centre open which helps keen childcare affordable.

In Newcastle, Labour councillors have kept libraries open, so families can afford to find a book to read to their children.

And just up the M42 in Gedling, the council is helping keep mortgages and parking affordable.

If Labour was in government in Westminster, we would end rail rip-offs by capping fare increases on every route.

We would force the energy firms to give pensioners over the age of 75 the lowest possible tariff.

We stop the tax on pensioners by not going ahead with the 50p tax cut.

And reverse the cuts to tax credits by reversing the more generous pensions tax reliefs the government introduced for the richest.

None of these require extra spending.

They just need better choices, different values.

Jobs

We have a jobs crisis in this country.

A million young people are out of work.

The government have set up a work programme which doesn’t even guarantee work.

A jobs programme which doesn’t even guarantee jobs.

How out of touch can you get?

Labour councils and councillors across the country are already showing there is another way.

In Liverpool for example, a Labour council is creating more than a thousand new apprenticeships and building more than two thousand homes.

Working to bring back hope.

And if we were in government in Westminster, we would tax bank bonuses to guarantee 100,000 unemployed young people real jobs.

We would conquer long-term youth unemployment all around the country.

Every person aged 18 – 24 who was out of work for a year would be given a placement in a small business or similar.
And we’d make sure they take it.

Real jobs, real prospects, real training.

We would get Britain working again.

NHS

Look what they’re doing to the NHS.

David Cameron has betrayed all his promises on the NHS.

His government came to office saying they were going to leave the NHS alone.

‘No more top down reorganisations of the NHS’ is what they said.

But as soon as they got in, what did they try to do?

Not just a reorganisation of the NHS.

But the biggest reorganisation in the history of the NHS.

Breaking it up.

Damaging patient care.

And spending money reorganising even while they sack nurses.

How out of touch can you get?

Labour councils will act as the last line of defence against the fragmentation of the NHS.

And if we were in government now, we would protect 6,000 nurses’ jobs by dumping their top-down reorganisation

Crime

And when it comes to keeping our communities safe, look what this Tory-led government are doing. Taking 16,000 police officers off the streets.

Ditching ASBOs.

How out touch can you get?

Our parents and grandparents often say that communities were safer and stronger in times gone by.

You were more likely to know your neighbour, kids respected the elderly and young people felt the country had something to offer them.

We can’t recreate the past.

But I believe in a country with those values of respect, responsibility and opportunity.

The Labour Group here in Birmingham is campaigning to introduce a tougher approach to anti social behaviour and challenging cuts to the West Midlands police budget.

And that is the approach we want to see:

Common Sense Policing

That means three things.

Firstly, keeping frontline police on the streets.

Keeping PCSOs on the streets.

Secondly, it means that the police and local authorities must have enough power to deal with antisocial behaviour.

ASBOs aren’t perfect, but I have had too many people in my constituency in tears about their neighbours from hell to think that the solution is to just scrap ASBOs altogether.

But that’s what the Tories are doing.

Thirdly, we need to encourage police to nip problems in the bud.

Instead of just giving people a caution knowing they will commit further offences, those who do the wrong thing should be forced to make it up to the victim.

Make good on the damage they have caused, help rebuild the community project, clean up the graffiti, fix a wrecked garden.

Of course, it won’t be appropriate in all circumstances and should only happen if the victim wants it to happen.

When offenders have to confront the consquences of their crimes and meet their victims, they can come to understand what they have done and the damage they have caused.

This has made some less likely to commit further offences: it puts them back onto the right path.

Here in the West Midlands, the police are already working with local authorities to try out this approach.

And it is working.

But the problem is less than one in thirty victims across the country sees this kind of approach being employed.

So the difference with Labour is that:

We would be keeping police on the streets not taking them off.

We would be strengthening powers to deal with anti social behaviour not taking it away.

And we would force offenders who break something or cause damage in the community to fix it.

That’s commonsense policing.

The Tories have abandoned any pretence they can govern for the whole country.

They have abandoned Middle Britain.

They prefer to listen to those who have given millions of pounds to the Conservative Party.

Labour would govern for the whole country, not just for the wealthy few.

Those are the values that in these tough times, this country needs more than ever today.

Those are the values at the heart of what we are campaigning for in these local elections.

 

NB: Nicholas Watt from the Guardian has a report on the questions asked of Ed Miliband here.

Step Forward, Ed Miliband.

Step Forward, Ed Miliband

In the last two weeks the Government has had its worst period in office since the election. The Conservatives have been battered by their supporters in the media and by their own MPs.

The budget was little more than an unmitigated disaster for the Government. Cutting the 50p rate of tax and introducing the “granny tax” has seriously damaged the Government amongst it’s supporters. The “strategical genius” that is George Osborne was made to look like an utter plonker on Today when he said that he did not earn over £150,000 so would not benefit from the £10,000 tax cut that he had just given to those fortunate to earn over £150k.

Ed Miliband sensed a weakness and took his opportunity. He produced his finest performance in the House of Commons so far:

Francis Maude, often cited as being one of the cleverest and most political astute members of the Government has had an absolutely torrid week after telling the media that people should prepare for a tanker driver strike that has not yet been called. This has seen queues, shortages and even the threat of violence at petrol stations across the UK. A cheap shot at a trade union that has caused a national crisis – not the finest strategic decision.

Not forgetting the pasty tax outrage, of course. Damn their hides.

All of this has given Labour a big opportunity. I struggle to remember a time where any Government had been shown to be more incompetent than this one. This gives Labour a big opportunity. We are now maintaining poll leads of around 10% after starting this year in a statistical tie with the Conservatives. We are polling in the mid 40s, something that has not been achieved since before the 2010 general election.

Labour v. Conservative Polling - No.1 indicates the last YouGov Poll on 28/3/12

This is a big improvement on our polling position late last year where we were often behind the Tories. It can also give Labour supporters heart going into the May local elections – If these polling results can be replicated on the ground then we would be set to make big gains across the UK. The Government has shown itself to be arrogant and foolish, and it may well pay the price for that. It is now up to Labour to capitalise upon these opportunities and make this poll lead a minimum, not a maximum.

As a Party we have now earned the right to be heard in the media and in the country. We need to make sure that we are speaking in the same language as the Public*.

We can take heart. This Government can be beaten.

This is Ed Miliband’s time to shine.

NB:

*We need to be talking about these issues. Source: YouGov/The Sun Poll. 27th March 2012

This poll produced by YouGov as part of their regular data set for The Sun. We know from the elections that were fought in the ’80s, ’90s and 00′s that Labour only wins elections when health and education are the highest issues on voting issue indexes. Here, they clearly are not. This provides us with cause for concern – but also an opportunity. If we can achieve a score draw on the economy (Which I think will be the best possible outcome in 2015) and produce a sensible message on immigration then we may well succeed at the next election.

 

Reforming Party Funding

“We’ve got to stop this perception that parties can somehow be bought by big donations either from very rich people, or trade unions, or businesses.”

- David Cameron, speaking after the cash for honours ‘scandal’ in 2006.

I agree with the Prime Minister.

Over the last few days there has been outrage that is quite justified about the way in which the (now former) Treasurer of the Conservative Party, Peter Cruddas (who himself made a donation of £125,000 in the final quarter of 2011), invited donations of more than £250,000 so that the donor could meet David Cameron and other senior members of the Government. It was also suggested that such donors could influence policy making by the No. 10 Policy Unit, which is partly staffed by civil servants. Donors were also promised the opportunity to have dinner with the Prime Minister in his residence above No.11 Downing Street or at Chequers. It was also set out to two undercover journalists from the The Sunday Times how measures to allow overseas nationals (which is illegal under UK electoral law) could be made to the Conservative Party.

Looking back at donations made to the Tories since the General Election in 2010 you can see a number of individuals that have donated exactly £250,000 or more than that amount. (Source: Electoral Commission website). Unlike the cash for (no) honours scandal where there was no evidence of impropriety, the Sunday Times has documentary evidence that this kind of deal was offered to potential donors by the person in charge of raising funds for the Tories.

The highly charged debate in the House of Commons saw the Tories and Lib Dems attack Labour on the basis that Labour is funded by Trade Unions. Of course, to Tories and some Liberal Democrats, there is something wrong with the fact that millions of people make a choice to donate to the political fund in support of the Labour Party. That money must form the most transparent and above board ‘influence’ on any modern political party.

Despite that of course it is undeniable that in the modern world there is an expectation that donating large sums of money will provide the donor with influence of some kind, whether political or policy based influence that allows them to further their own cause. That will be true of the uber-wealthy individuals who donate to the Tories, trades union that donate to Labour and even a fraudster who donated to the Lib Dems. 

The only solution that I can see that will severely limit the influence that donors may have on our politics is to place a limit on donations – presumably this would not apply to the trades union on the basis that those bulk sums constitute hundreds of thousands of micro donations – and replace the cut in income with funding by the state. The loophole which allows foreign individuals to donate large sums of money to British parities must also be closed.

The Hayden Commision on party funding outlined a number of recommendations some years ago:

  • Capping spending for political campaigns.
  • Capping individual donations. (It has been suggested that a £50,000 limit should be applied to individuals)
  • Increasing state funding by £25m a year, linked to public support –  eligible parties should receive 50p each year for every vote cast for them in the most recent General Election and 25p for every vote in the most recent ballots for the Scottish Parliament, Welsh Assembly and European Parliament.
  • Cutting spending by the largest parties between elections by £20m each.

No political consensus was achieved on those proposals. Sir Christopher Kelly’s report ”Political Party Funding – Ending the Big Donor Culture” identified a number of recommendations that should be implemented after this scandal (which was avoidable):

  • Cap donations at £10,000 per year per individual.
  • Cap expenditure and offer limited extensions of state funding.
  • Accept that trade union money is different if, and only if, each individual trade union member payment to the party is made more transparent.
  • Greater openness on what is being spent and a recognition that parties will need to be more efficient and spend less overall.
  • New regime to be regulated by the Electoral Commission to regulate the new regime.

These proposals are sensible. They may be difficult politically as it would cost each voter 50p per year. All that we can hope is that the cost argument is not used to kill these reforms. Of course, opposition parties are already partly funded by the state – Labour receives Short Money, Cranborne Money and grants to aide policy development.

Had a system of state funding been implemented then the Tories would not be in the uncomfortable position that they find themselves. The cash for honours ‘scandal’ would have been avoided because party bosses would not be under such pressure to bring in money. Individuals would no longer be able to buy influence to further their own agenda.

It is time that Labour and the Tories put aside our own interests to genuinely act in the national interest. The public are best served by politicians who listen to the public rather than to a select few wealthy individuals.

Politicians must put the country first. State funding is the way that vested interests can be removed from the political process.

NB: Peter Watt sets out here why these reforms are needed based on some cold, hard facts about British politics.

 

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...